Technology & AI
International / unresolved
Attackers Hijack 333 Tor Exit Nodes to Intercept SSH Traffic
In early October 2026, attackers compromised 333 Tor exit nodes, roughly 10% of the network, to intercept SSH connections and potentially access plaintext email.
Share this article
THE PRIMARY BRIEF
- 01 · The primary finding
Attackers hijacked 333 Tor exit nodes, about 10% of the network, to intercept SSH traffic and potentially plaintext email.
- 02 · The primary evidence
Security researcher "kaba" discovered the activity on October 2, 2026, after observing infected nodes redirecting SSH connections, leading to The Tor Project removing them by October 5, 2026.
- 03 · Why it matters
Tor users who ignored "REMOTE HOST IDENTIFICATION HAS CHANGED" warnings on compromised nodes risked having their login credentials stolen, impacting the network's promised privacy and security.
Attackers hijacked 333 Tor exit nodes in early October 2026, comprising approximately 10% of the network's total exit relays. This allowed them to intercept SSH traffic and potentially access plaintext email for users of the privacy network.
This incident directly targeted the anonymity and security Tor provides. Users who accessed services like SSH through the compromised nodes faced a risk of having their login credentials stolen if they ignored security warnings, which undermines trust in the network's protective capabilities.
What the records show
The attackers gained access to underlying Linux servers and deployed the Ebury 1.8.3 OpenSSH backdoor, a tool designed to steal credentials. This campaign likely began in August 2026, with the backdoor quietly deployed around that time. Once the servers were compromised, the attackers modified the torrc configuration files on these relays. This modification rewrote exit policies, specifically enabling port 22 for SSH traffic, which allowed for the interception of SSH connections. The attackers also converted some regular relays that were not initially exit nodes into exit nodes, expanding their reach. In many instances, these changes also closed encrypted mail ports, such as IMAPS and POP3S, making plaintext email more accessible.
The timeline
In August 2026, attackers gained server access and deployed the Ebury backdoor. On October 2, 2026, security researcher "kaba" discovered the malicious activity, observing 333 infected exit nodes beginning a coordinated campaign to redirect SSH connections to attacker-controlled interception servers. The researcher scanned Tor's roughly 3,000 exit relays and identified those redirecting SSH traffic. Kaba notified the Tor Project's network health team of the findings that same evening. The Tor Project received reports of hacked machines and edited torrc files over the weekend of October 3–4. By October 4, 2026, the Tor Project began flagging the compromised relays. The project officially confirmed the incident on October 5, 2026, and removed all affected relays from the network's consensus, the list of relays Tor clients use. The hacking campaign went undetected for three days, between October 2 and 5.
What changed and for whom
For the Tor network, 333 relays, approximately 10% of its total, were compromised and subsequently removed from service. For users, those making SSH connections through compromised nodes were at risk of credential theft if they ignored host key warnings. The Tor Project urged Linux relay operators to audit their servers after the attack.
What the subject has said publicly
The Tor Project's network health team stated in an October 5 notice to relay operators that "It seems the attacker is gaining access to Linux based hosts and when these machines are running non-exits they are editing the torrc file and turning them into exits to be able to carry out the SSH attack". An October 5 advisory from The Tor Project confirmed that hacked Linux hosts were intercepting SSH traffic. The organization also urged Linux relay operators to audit their servers.
What we could not confirm
We could not confirm the identity of the attackers responsible for the hijack. The total number of users whose credentials or plaintext emails were compromised remains unconfirmed. We also could not confirm the specific geographic distribution of the compromised servers.
SHOW YOUR WORK