Science & Space
Nicaragua · Direct U.S. connection
Hidden Magma Sources Found Beneath Nicaragua's Masaya Volcano
Satellite observations by Pennsylvania State University scientists reveal two previously unknown magma reservoirs under Masaya volcano, impacting forecasting for nearly 2 million people.
Share this article
THE PRIMARY BRIEF
- 01 · The primary finding
Scientists discovered two previously unrecognized magma sources beneath Nicaragua's Masaya volcano, revealing a more complex underground system.
- 02 · The primary evidence
This finding comes from six years of satellite observations, from 2018 to 2024, of ground movement around the volcano, published in *Geophysical Research Letters*.
- 03 · Why it matters
The discovery could improve eruption forecasting for the active volcano, which is near approximately 2 million people and a popular tourist destination.
Scientists from Pennsylvania State University, led by Lizzie Johnson and including Young Cheol Kim, found evidence of two hidden magma sources beneath Nicaragua's active Masaya volcano. This discovery, published on October 1, 2026, in Geophysical Research Letters, changes the understanding of the volcano's underground structure for the approximately 2 million people living nearby.
This finding matters because Masaya is a popular tourist destination and its activity poses a potential hazard to the dense local population. A better understanding of its subsurface magma movements could lead to improved monitoring and eruption forecasting, enhancing public safety for the communities around the volcano.
What the records show
The research team, from Pennsylvania State University, analyzed satellite data collected from 2018 through 2024. They used interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR), a technique that sends microwave signals from a satellite to the ground and compares returning signals over time. This method allows detection of small changes in ground elevation. The scientists published their findings in Geophysical Research Letters.
The observations showed two different patterns of ground movement. The ground within Masaya's broader caldera first sank, then began to rise. Researchers interpret this as a sign that fresh magma might be entering a deeper reservoir, increasing pressure. However, the area immediately surrounding the active Santiago crater, known for its lava lake, continuously sank throughout the six-year study period. This difference in movement suggests a separate, shallower magma reservoir operating independently from the deeper one. These contrasting behaviors indicate a more intricate underground magma system than previously known. Masaya's last significant lava flow occurred in 1772. The volcano also persistently releases sulfur dioxide, which can affect nearby communities.
The timeline
Satellite observations for this study spanned from 2018 through 2024. The research findings were formally published on October 1, 2026. News about the discovery began to circulate widely in mid-October 2026.
What changed and for whom
The primary change is a more detailed scientific understanding of Masaya volcano's subsurface structure. Scientists now have evidence of at least two distinct magma reservoirs beneath the volcano, indicating a more complex system. This improved knowledge offers a foundation for potentially better eruption warning systems for the estimated 2 million people living near the volcano. The study does not point to an immediate eruption threat, but the new insight into magma dynamics is a step toward better long-term hazard assessments.
What the subject has said publicly
Lizzie Johnson, the lead author of the paper, stated that these observations help scientists "better understand how magma moves beneath Masaya and may improve monitoring and eruption forecasting in the future". Johnson also noted that "Having a thorough understanding of Masaya's volcanic activity and its related hazards is critical as around 2 million people live near Masaya and the caldera is a national park and popular tourist destination".
What we could not confirm
We could not confirm if specific plans are underway to implement new monitoring based on these findings. The timeline for the development or deployment of improved forecasting tools also remains unconfirmed.
SHOW YOUR WORK